Three young US roommates found more than 40,000 dollars (£24,000) in cash in an old sofa they bought from a thrift shop.
And they returned the money to the 91-year-old widow whose couch had been given away.
"We just pulled out envelopes and envelopes," said Cally Guasti, a social worker with Family of Woodstock who shares a flat with two friends in New Paltz, 75 miles north of New York City.
"My mouth was literally hanging open - everybody's was - it was an unfathomable amount."
She said she and her friends had bought the beat-up couch and a chair for 55 dollars (£33) at a Salvation Army thrift shop in March.
They noticed the arm cushions were weirdly lumpy. Then, one night in April, one of them, student Reese Werkhoven, of New York City, opened a zipper on one arm and found an envelope.
It contained 4,000 dollars (£2,385) in bubble-wrapped bills.
Ms Guasti, Mr Werkhoven and roommate Lara Russo opened the other arm zipper and started finding the treasure stashed inside. They counted it up: 40,800 dollars £24,330).
"We put it all on a bed," Ms Guasti said. "We laid it all out and started counting. And we were screaming. In the morning, our neighbours were like, 'We thought you won the lottery.'"
Later on, Ms Guasti found a deposit slip with a woman's name on it. Ms Werkhoven called her the next morning.
"She said, 'I have a lot of money in that couch and I really need it,'" Ms Guasti said.
They drove to the home of the woman, who turned out to be the elderly woman. She cried in gratitude when they gave her the cash she had hidden away.
The woman's family had donated the couch to the Salvation Army while she was having health problems.
Ms Guasti said the three had considered the option of keeping the money, but decided they could not do that.
"At the end of the day, it wasn't ours," she said. "I think if any of us had used it, it would have felt really wrong."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article