The author of a damning report on Rotherham's failure to tackle monumental levels of child sexual exploitation has told MPs that its police force should face the same level of scrutiny over their "failure".
Louise Casey found a council in denial about how more than 1,400 children had been subjected to rape, violence and trafficking by gangs of mainly Asian men.
The Government later replaced the local authority's political leadership with commissioners.
Ms Casey told Commons Communities Committee she believed South Yorkshire Police's failures in relation to child sexual exploitation in Rotherham should be subjected to the same level of scrutiny.
She added: "South Yorkshire Police more generally, need to look at their failure to the victims of Rotherham, full stop.
"Every member of staff that we asked to see had to see us or else we would infer something negative. We could look at any document we wanted to look at. We left no stoned unturned. We took much longer than I know colleagues wanted us to because we wanted to be utterly thorough.
"In my view that same scrutiny has not happened with South Yorkshire Police."
Ms Casey said some police officers had been referred to the Independent Police Complaints Commission so their actions in relation to Rotherham exploitation allegations could be investigated.
She described it as "too easy a solution."
Ms Casey added: "The police have to step up and accept the same level of responsibility to those victims and those perpetrators as the local authority.
"We were asked to inspect Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council and we left no stone unturned. It's a pretty thorough and damning report. The same level of scrutiny has not happened ... to the police in Rotherham over that time."
Asked if that should now happen, Ms Casey said: "In my view it should happen, yes."
The Casey report criticised a council which it said had a culture of bullying, "misplaced political correctness" and silencing whistleblowers who tried to speak out.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article