SENIOR police officers should not have to justify the cost of major investigations such as murder and missing person inquiries, and should instead be allowed to get on with their job, according to a representative body.
The Association of Scottish Police Superintendents (ASPS) has raised concerns following suggestions senior officers may be questioned by the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) – the body which will oversee the new single police force – on operational decisions.
ASPS president David O'Connor said he will raise the issue with the SPA board. The concerns follow comments by SPA member Iain Whyte at the weekend in which he stated there are no "no-go areas when assessing best value". He said such scrutiny was not about second-guessing officers but about "making sure they are making the right decisions".
However, the ASPS said it was the job of the chief constable to appear before the SPA to account for spending decisions.
Mr O'Connor said: "I welcome firm and robust scrutiny of the chief constable by the SPA but I would be concerned if they wanted to scrutinise individual senior investigating officers – this is firmly in the operational sphere and these officers should only be accountable to the chief constable."
The concerns follow a power struggle between the new single force's Chief Constable Stephen House and SPA chairman Vic Emery over control of police support staff.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article