POLICE Scotland chief constable Stephen House's proposal for a new training course for senior officers has met with strong objections.
Plans to set up a new Scottish course for aspiring police chiefs, which would replace the need to complete the current UK scheme, were greeted with opposition by a new body that includes staff associations and the country's police watchdog.
Officers across the UK wanting to become an assistant, deputy or chief constable have to go through the Senior Police National Assessment Centre, followed by completion of the Strategic Command Course at Bramshill, Hampshire. However, Police Scotland has proposed an alternative scheme, which would be equivalent to the latter, but officers completing it would only be eligible for posts in Scotland.
Deputy chief constable Rose Fitzpatrick presented the plan to a recent meeting of the Scottish Police Consultative Forum.
The body includes groups that represent officers and the Scottish Police Authority (SPA).
Her proposal made the case that a new system was required to reflect differences in Scottish criminal law and governance legislation.
However, according to one police source, "overwhelming opposition" to the proposal had been expressed at the meeting.
Critics believed a separate Scottish qualification may not be accepted in England and Wales and could restrict job opportunities.
The Scottish Government has confirmed a new working group is exploring options on the issue.
A Police Scotland spokesperson said: "The proposal put forward seeks to expand and complement the current arrangements not to restrict them in any way, therefore, no officers would be disadvantaged."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article