THE threat of a national strike by postal workers over the Government's controversial plans to privatise the Royal Mail has come a step closer with formal notice of an industrial action ballot.
The Communication Workers Union served formal legal notice to the company of its intention to ballot its members.
Ballot papers will go out on September 27, with the result announced on October 16.
If there is a yes vote, the earliest that strike action could take place would be October 23.
It is the first national strike ballot in Royal Mail since 2009 and will affect 115,000 postal workers in Royal Mail and Parcelforce, but not the Post Office, which is a separate company.
The dispute is over pay, pensions and the impact of privatisation on job security, terms and conditions.
Dave Ward, CWU deputy general secretary, said: "The Government's privatisation agenda has destabilised everything. Postal workers are rightly concerned about their future so we want a legally binding agreement on protections for jobs, terms and conditions - regardless of who owns the company.
"We don't want a race to the bottom in the postal industry where companies compete on poverty pay, few employment rights and poor services simply to maximise payouts to wealthy shareholders. Without an agreement, strikes are inevitable."
Royal Mail said it was disappointed the union was pressing ahead with a strike ballot.
A statement said: "Any industrial action, or the possibility of disruption, is damaging to our customers and our business, especially in the run-up to Christmas, our busiest time. It therefore has a direct bearing on our ability to sustain good quality, long-term employment for our people.
"We are committed to reaching an agreement with the CWU to give our customers and employees continued stability."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article