SCOTS living in the countryside are more likely to volunteer to help others than people living in urban areas, a new report has found.
A study by Dr Alasdair Rutherford, a lecturer in Quantitative Methods at the University of Stirling, found levels of volunteering were 2.5 times higher in the countryside than in cities, despite the potentially greater costs of travel involved.
Rural volunteers were more likely to be involved in service provision activities such as giving assistance to others, arranging transport and organising direct services.
They were also more likely to be involved in co-ordination activities such as committee and office work, and organising events and activities. More rural volunteers also said they helped several organisations.
The report has been prepared for the Economic and Social Research Council's (ESRC) annual Festival of Social Science, which runs from November 2-9.
Dr Rutherford said the reasons for the difference in levels of volunteering may be down to higher costs associated with running public services in the countryside, which provides an incentive for communities to cooperate through voluntary organisations in order to provide essential services. He added: "Rural communities that already have high levels of volunteering may be better equipped to absorb additional voluntary roles, as the social connections and support structures are already in place.
"However, these communities may already be at full capacity, with available volunteers unable to take on any more responsibility for public service provision."
"Urban communities may have untapped potential but weaker networks, while more rural communities have better connections but risk overloading individuals. Regardless, different approaches will need to be taken by policy makers that take account of the local context if volunteering is to be supported."
Dr Rutherford will expand upon the research at an event taking place today in Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article