VITAL documents relating to the Lockerbie bombing are to be released by Libyan officials when they believe the country is stable enough.
The Libyan ambassador to the UK said the new government in Tripoli was preparing to release all documents on the 1988 bombing.
In an interview on the 24th anniversary of the bombing, Mahmud Nacua – whose claims have been met with scepticism from campaigners – also paid his respects to the victims and their families.
He said: "We sympathise with them, with their loss and I think our government, when we have enough time, enough security and stability, all files will be open and everyone will know what happened with that crime."
On December 21, 1988, 270 people were killed when Pan Am flight 103 exploded over Lockerbie.
In 2001, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi was convicted of mass murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.
He was released eight years later on compassionate grounds and died in May this year.
Campaigners from the Justice for Megrahi group maintain the Libyan was innocent and have been calling for an independent inquiry into the original investigation and his conviction.
Reacting to the claims by Mr Nacua, Robert Forrester, secretary of the campaign group, said the move was encouraging but added that he was sceptical.
"It is excellent news on the grounds that more openness on the part of all governments involved in this, not just Libya but Scotland, the UK and the US, is to be welcomed," he said.
"It is positive to have openness and we need a lot more of that, but maybe there is some pressure being brought to bear by what is happening at home."
Mr Forrester said the latest development had come after eight allegations were lodged by campaigners against the Crown Office, police officers and a forensic scientist for their alleged attempts to pervert the course of justice in relation to the Lockerbie bombing.
Mr Forrester said: "The timing of this is interesting on the grounds that politicians at Holyrood have just delivered something of a body blow to the Government and the Crown Office in Scotland by voting unanimously across an all-party divide in the Justice Committee to keep our petition open for an inquiry in relation to the allegations we have made."
He added: "This whole issue has been fraught with obfuscation for years, so on the plus side it would appear that one of the governments involved is intending to be more open when the circumstances allow them to be more open, which could be some time away."
Dr Jim Swire, who lost his daughter Flora in the bombing and was formerly the spokesman for the British relatives of Lockerbie (UK Families Flight 103), also raised doubts over the announcement.
Dr Swire said: "The place that the authorities want to look if they really want to procrastinate over this is Scotland, not Libya."
Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland is facing mounting pressure to further a new investigation into the bombing, including pushing for officers from Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary to visit Libya.
Scotland's top law officer has written to Libyan officials and is said to be working closely with the Foreign Office to enable this to happen.
Mr Mulholland is also facing criticism over plans to abolish the ancient law of corroboration in Scotland.
Critics claim it will lead to miscarriages of justice, but the Lord Advocate argues injustices are already taking place because the Crown cannot prosecute due to a lack of witnesses.
He said: "A miscarriage occurs when there is a wrongful acquittal, or an inability to prosecute something that clearly took place, or where there is a reasonable prospect of conviction on the evidence.
"What the public doesn't see is the cases that we can't take up, so long as the requirement for corroboration is there."
Mr Mulholland added: "My view is that the justice system is too weighted in favour of the accused."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article