A SCOTS couple with six children are to be extradited to the USA for allegedly exporting chemicals to make highly addictive crystal meth, after judges at the highest appeal court in the country rejected their bid to remain in Britain.
The decision was made despite an emotional plea by the couple who believe splitting up the family is contrary to article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The woman was released on bail and her now estranged husband was held in custody following the ruling by the Supreme Court.
The pair, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, face being sent to the US in 28 days, although their lawyers could try to challenge the decision at the European Court of Human Rights.
Lord Hope, Deputy President of the Supreme Court, admitted the best interests of the children, whose ages range between one and 14, "must be to continue to live with their mother" and if she is taken away "it seems likely that the long term effects of a prolonged separation of the magnitude that is in prospect in this case will be profound".
But he said "the interests of justice must be given effect to".
The American authorities, who want them to face trial in Arizona, claim at least 70 laboratories producing methamphetamine were allegedly supplied by the couple and indicated Class A drugs with a street value of $13.3 million (£8.1m) could have been produced. The pair were said to have received $132,922 from the sale of chemicals, including red phosphorus and iodine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article