A SCOTTISH QC has been cleared of perjury claims following a ferry disaster in the South Pacific.
Ramsay Dalgety – who moved to Tonga in 1991 – was accused of giving false evidence into the 2009 sinking in which 74 people died.
At a court hearing yesterday, the case against Lord Dalgety was reportedly thrown out due to insufficient evidence.
Lord Dalgety appeared in court in relation to the sinking of MV Princess Ashika in August 2009, the worst accident in the country's maritime history. Among those who drowned was Scot Daniel MacMillan, 48, from Islay.
The former director of Scottish Opera was secretary of the Shipping Corporation of Polynesia.
Lord Ramsey was accused of playing down his involvement in the corporation during the inquest into the tragedy. However, while the Lord appears to have weathered the legal storm, it also emerged yesterday his Scottish wife, Mary, died just five days ago.
From Edinburgh, her obituary said she died "suddenly" in the Tongan capital Nuku'alofa on Sunday. Her funeral was held in Tonga on Wednesday and a memorial service will take place in Edinburgh.
Lord Dalgety was previously criticised in an official report into the sinking.
He was described by Tonga's Royal Commission of Inquiry as "unfit to hold such an important position", "evasive" and "lacking credibility".
The former Edinburgh councillor was also criticised for failing to order an independent survey before the purchase of the ferry, which he admitted had been a "rust bucket".
Dalgety was charged with perjury and put under house arrest in February 2010. Yesterday authorities on the island cleared his name.
Justice Charles Cato said Lord Dalgety's words were so far removed from the vital issues the Commission had to consider on the crash that he did not think a guilty verdict would be a safe verdict.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article