Developers have failed to get the go-ahead for a new wind farm because of fears over the impact it would have on the landscape.
Energy minister Fergus Ewing refused to give consent for 23 turbines to go up on the Blairmore Estate, near Drumnadrochit in the Highlands.
It is the ninth time since the SNP came to power in 2007 that the Scottish Government has turned down plans for an on-shore wind farm.
Developer Sustainable Energy Limited had hoped to build a 69 megawatt wind farm on the Blairmore Estate.
Highland Council had objected to the plans, arguing the development would have a major visual impact on communities in the area.
Mr Ewing has now agreed with the findings of the public inquiry reporter, that the number and height of the turbines would be out of scale with the surrounding area and would have a significant adverse impact on the landscape.
The energy minister was also concerned about the impact the noise from the turbines would have on nearby properties.
He stressed that green energy projects must be the "right developments in the right places".
Mr Ewing said: "Scotland has enormous potential for renewable energy that is delivering jobs and investment across Scotland, and I am determined to ensure communities all over Scotland reap the benefit from renewable energy - but not at any cost and we will ensure a balanced approach in taking forward this policy, as we have in the past and will in future.
"The Scottish Government wants to see the right developments in the right places and Scottish planning policy is clear that the design and location of any wind farm should reflect the scale and character of the landscape, and should be considered environmentally acceptable."
Since 2007, the SNP administration has given the green light to 32 on-shore wind farms and one off-shore wind farm, as well as 19 hydro electric projects and four wave and tidal power projects.
Nine applications have been turned down, all of which were on-shore wind farms.
Ministers are currently considering another 48 applications for on-shore wind farms, as well as applications for five other energy projects.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article