AS many as 4000 women a year are given unnecessary treatment for cancer through breast screening in the UK, an independent review has found.
But the investigation into the national breast screening programme said the benefits outweighed the harms, with the relative risk of dying from breast cancer 20% less than those who did not go through the clinical investigation.
The investigation panel estimated that for 10,000 women in the UK invited to screening from age 50, for 20 years, about 681 cancers would be found, of which 129 would represent over-diagnosis, and 43 deaths from breast cancer would be prevented.
Last week, Professor Peter Gotzsche claimed 10 women were harmed by unnecessary treatment for every woman saved.
But the panel concluded that while it estimated for every breast cancer death prevented there were three over-diagnosed cases, the UK breast screening programmes confer "significant benefit". It said: "On the positive side, screening confers a reduction in the risk of mortality from breast cancer. On the negative side, there is the knowledge that she has perhaps a 1% chance of having a cancer diagnosed and treated that would never have caused problems if she had not been screened."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article