Children are copying provocative dance moves and repeating sexual song lyrics after being exposed to explicit pop music, with some understanding their meanings by the age of five, a survey of parents has found.
It suggests that mums and dads are increasingly concerned that many of today's pop stars put on far more explicit performances than when they were young, and that it is sending their children negative messages about sex.
Many fear that their sons and daughters are being taught that they need to show off their bodies and act in a sexual manner in order to get noticed.
The findings, in a poll conducted by parenting website Netmums, come just days after Jo Heywood, headmistress of Heathfield School in Ascot, warned that teenage girls were being "manipulated and confused" by would-be celebrity role models like pop star Miley Cyrus, who start out as clean-cut TV characters and reinvent themselves as controversial performers.
The Netmums poll, which surveyed more than 1,500 parents, found that more than eight in 10 (81.7%) said that their child had sung or repeated sexual song lyrics without realising what they meant, while a third (33.4%) admitted that their youngster had copied overtly provocative dance moves they had seen pop stars perform.
Almost one in 12 (7.8%) said that their son or daughter had sung lyrics knowing what they meant.
Around 8.5% of the parents questioned said that their child was five or even younger when they first became aware of the meaning of the songs they were singing.
The most common age for children to be able to understand explicit song lyrics and actions was 10, chosen by almost a fifth (18.2%) of parents.
Asked how they felt about singers such as Miley Cyrus and Rihanna, more than half of parents (55.9%) said that while they did not mind stars acting sexily, they believed some were "over the top".
Around 18.8% said that pop stars had always acted in this fashion because they knew it sold music.
Almost seven in 10 (68.6%) said that the message being sent by some singers was that "you need to flash your body and be sexual to get noticed".
Of those questioned that have boys, almost half (45.4%) said that they feared sexy music videos may make them grow up expecting women to be too sexually available, while over half (58%) said it may leave their sons expecting women to have unrealistic figures.
Of those with girls, three-quarters worried their daughters would think they would be judged on their looks, not personality or achievements, and nearly two-thirds (64.3%) said they thought their child might be expected to be sexual too soon.
Around 87.1% of parents said that they thought pop stars acted worse today, and had to go further to shock, than singers from their own childhood did.
Many of the parents surveyed said that they tried to shield their children from watching explicit music videos.
Netmums founder Siobhan Freegard said: "Modern parents aren't prudes - they know sex sells.
"But there's a strong feeling that things have gone too far now.
"It's toxic to tell young kids casual sex and violence are something to aspire to.
"Instead, if a star wants to make a statement, why not use their brain, not their body?"
:: The poll surveyed 1,522 Netmums members last month.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article