Royal Dutch Shell is to cut 15 billion US dollars (£9.9 billion) from its spending plans over the next three years as it responds to sliding oil prices.
The Anglo-Dutch oil giant pledged not to over-react to the oil decline and said lower prices created opportunities to reduce its own costs.
The comments came as Shell unveiled results showing a 12% rise in underlying profits to 3.26 billion US dollars (£2.15 billion) for the final quarter of 2014.
The performance was boosted by recent efforts to restructure its downstream operation, as well as increased output of higher-margin products.
However, profits for its upstream exploration and production division still fell by 30% to 1.73 billion US dollars (£1.14 billion) in the quarter.
Chief executive Ben van Beurden said: "We are taking a prudent approach here and we must be careful not to over-react to the recent fall in oil prices.
"Shell is taking structured decisions to balance growth and returns."
Royal Dutch Shell's shares were more than 3% lower as the profits figure for the final quarter of 2014 came in below City expectations.
The company, which employs 90,000 people in more than 70 countries, still made profits of 22.5 billion US dollars (£14.9 billion), a rise of 16% on a year earlier.
Last week Shell abandoned a 6.5 billion US dollars (£4.3 billion) plan to build one of the world's biggest petrochemical plants in Qatar with rival Qatar Petroleum.
Shell said the cost of the plant made it ''commercially unfeasible, particularly in the current economic climate prevailing in the energy industry".
This move came amid a flurry of activity among oil producers to scale back new investment in light of oil prices that have dropped by more than half since the summer.
Mr van Beurden added: "Our strategy is delivering, but we're not complacent. Weaker oil prices underline that there's a lot more to do. The three themes of financial performance, capital efficiency and project delivery will remain as Shell's priorities in 2015."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article