THE SNP has demanded clarity on the future of the Type 26 frigates that will secure years of work for two Glasgow shipyards
Following reports that the ships could be ordered in small batches, MPs asked the Defence Secretary for assurances over the order.
The £4bn deal for 13 ships to be build over 15 years would secure the yards in Govan and Scotstoun for a generation.
A Cabinet Office document stated they would be ordered in small batches "to bring realism to the project" has caused concern.
SNP defence spokesman, Brendan O'Hara pressed Defence Secretary Michael Fallon if he could explain the comments.
Mr Fallon said: "We confirmed earlier this year we are spending £859m on design of Type 26 frigates."
When challenged again to explain the comments Mr Fallon said: "Only the SNP could regard £859m as somehow half hearted we will be finalising the design of these ships shortly but we have to absolutely ensure we get good value for tax payer pounds."
Kirsten Oswald, East Renfrewshire SNP MP also asked for more clarity on what the comments meant for the workforce on the Clyde.
Minister of State, Phillip Dunne, said it had to be ensured costs did not spiral out of control
He said: "The workforce on the Clyde are manufacturing three offshore patrol vessels commissioned by the previous coalition government.
"We want to make sure before we enter the full manufacturing contracts that the contract structure are robust and we can hold contractors to account, unlike the aircraft carrier contracts which blew up to over double their original cost."
Later, Ms Oswald said: "I thought it was worth asking again to get a bit more meat on the bone to make it more clear.
"We did get a bit more of an answer, we can now go away and look at that and we have now a bit more clarity and confidence that the people who are busy there will continue to be busy there. "
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article