THE SNP has been forced to issue another warning to so-called "cybernats" after Sir Chris Hoy was bombarded with online abuse for suggesting Scots athletes could be disadvantaged if the country votes for independence.
Scotland's greatest Olympian was subjected to personal attacks on his schooling, upbringing and cycling career on internet forums after his comments on sporting success and the referendum.
The remarks from Sir Chris , who has long resisted involvement in the referendum debate, drew hostility from people who appeared to be backing independence.
The backlash moved Scottish Office minister David Mundell to condemn the "shameful" remarks.
Meanwhile, Willie Rennie, leader of the Liberal Democrats in Scotland, said: "The nationalists seek to silence everyone they disagree with.
"If this is the kind of Scotland we'll get with independence I am sure even more will reject the nationalists' plans.
"Chris Hoy refused to express a strong view on the referendum because he feared a 'hornet's nest'. It is little surprise when he faced this abuse when he didn't get involved."
A spokesman for the SNP condemned the attacks but said online abuse was not the preserve of one political persuasion. She said Nicola Sturgeon had received death threats on Twitter and "appalling remarks" were made on the Labour Party website about Alex Salmond's father.
Some posts on social media sites criticised Sir Chris's private education. Another said: "You have just went from being a Scottish hero in the eyes of the Bravehearts to being a traitor."
A further post said: "Afraid another comment by someone no longer living in Scotland."
Sir Chris was described as a "typical Scots Tory naysayer".
The critic added: "Most folk make a career and contribute to society by doing a job of work."
The SNP spokesman added: "We join Willie Rennie in condemning these comments regardless of what party political persuasion they come from.
"Online abuse has no place in the political debate.
"All of it must stop, because the referendum debate needs to be a positive one."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article