STANDARD Life is understood to be considering throwing its weight behind legal efforts by investors to claim billions of pounds from Royal Bank of Scotland.
It follows a £12 billion share issue conducted just months before its 2008 collapse.
Executives at Standard Life are understood to be keeping a close eye on legal cases against RBS although the Edinburgh pensions and investment giant is not currently part of proceedings.
Its stance could see it join another large investor Legal & General in preparing to take action against Edinburgh-headquartered RBS.
L&G is understood to have instructed solicitors at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. It is not known if Standard Life is also instructing the firm.
Lawyers for two other sets of investors have filed cases at the High Court in London.
The Royal Bank of Scotland Shareholder Action Group, which represents about 12,000 small investors, has hired London law firm Bird & Bird to seek up to £4bn in compensation. It is suing both RBS and former directors including ex-chief executive Fred Goodwin.
Another set of UK and foreign institutions, including the Strathclyde Pension Fund, are backing a claim led by Stewarts Law totalling hundreds of millions of pounds. They are suing just RBS but solicitors at Stewarts Law have said they are prepared to call former RBS executives to give evidence.
Both cases are thought to focus on alleged failings in RBS's disclosures to shareholders before fundraising.
If it was proved that RBS did mislead investors, it would breach the Financial Services and Markets Act.
There is due to be a case management hearing next week that will determine if the cases will be combined or heard separately.
Standard Life declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article