ENCOURAGING children to eat fruit and vegetables is often a battle, but turning it into a competition could be the answer, according to research.
A new study suggests that playing to a youngster's competitive streak is likely to result in them choosing more of the healthy foods. And it indicates that girls are more likely to respond to an element of competition in vegetable-eating than boys.
The study analyses the findings of a trial conducted by researchers at the universities of Edinburgh, Bath and Essex involving more than 600 pupils aged six to seven and nine to 10 in 31 schools. In the "individual" challenge, pupils were given a sticker if they chose a portion of fruit or vegetables at lunchtime, or brought one to school as part of a packed lunch. They were given an extra reward if they chose, or brought in, more than four of the foods over a week.
In the team - or "competition" - challenge, a second set of pupils were also given a sticker for choosing a portion of fruit and vegetables, but were split into groups of four, with the youngster in the group who had the most stickers at the end of the week gaining an extra reward.
There was also a control group that was offered no incentives for eating fruit or vegetables. The researchers found that although the results differed by pupils' age, gender and background, overall offering pupils incentives increased their consumption of the foods, with the competition challenge having a greater and longer-lasting effect than the individual scheme.
In the competition challenge, the proportion trying fruit and veg increased by around a third, the study found. It added that the individual challenge seemed to work very well for older children, but less so for younger pupils.
Dr Jonathan James, of the department of economics at Bath University, said: "Our study looked at ways in which we can better target interventions that change young people's eating habits.
"Through our research we found that introducing an element of competition at lunchtime could have larger effects on children's eating habits than using an incentive scheme that was based only on their own choices."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article