Nearly one in four people aged over 65 years old are owed money by their adult children, a study has found.
Some 23% of over-65s said their grown up children are still in debt to them, with the average amount outstanding put at £3,100, financial services provider MetLife found.
One in 10 retired people who had lent money to their children said the outstanding debt came to more than £5,000.
The survey found that older people's generosity went further than just lending money - as one in eight (12%) over-65s surveyed said that they still had adult children living with them or wider family, such as grandchildren.
Across Britain, people living in the North East of England were the most likely to say their adult child still owed them money, with more than one in three (36%) people there saying this.
In Scotland, one in five (20%) over-65s said their children still owed them cash. In Wales, the figure was 4%, although researchers cautioned that the survey sample size in Wales had been particularly small.
Within England, people living in the South West were the least likely to say that their adult children owed them money, with 12% saying they were owed some cash.
The research comes at a time when many older people have been handed new freedoms over how they use their retirement cash. From April, people aged 55 and over with a defined contribution (DC) pension have been given the flexibility to take their pension pot how they wish, subject to tax, rather than being required to by an income with it called an annuity.
Dominic Grinstead, managing director of MetLife UK, said: "Being able to lend adult children money is important to millions of retired people and many can definitely afford to do so and are happy to pay out.
"But the fact that so many are helping out adult children demonstrates that people need flexibility in their finances in order to be able to fund potential financial surprises."
More than 1,000 retired people took part in the research.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article