TAXPAYERS will meet more than three-quarters of the cost of staging a celebration of the UK's armed forces after organisers missed their sponsorship target by more than £130,000.
Stirling Council had planned to attract funding of £190,000 in "sponsorship from national companies" to help pay for this weekend's event, which clashes with the nearby 700th anniversary commemorations of the Battle of Bannockburn.
However, with just days to go before Armed Forces Day, only around £60,000 of commercial sponsorship has been secured, leaving the Scottish Government and the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to top up the local authority's contribution.
Steven Paterson, deputy leader of the SNP group on Stirling Council, said: "The Conservative-Labour administration set a totally unrealistic £190,000 target for corporate sponsorship when making the case for Stirling hosting National Armed Forces Day, and the failure to achieve even half leaves the taxpayer to fund this shortfall."
Stirling Council made the fundraising pledge in February after it emerged that the estimated price of staging Armed Forces Day had soared by a third to £524,000. The local authority, which has committed £250,000 to the event, yesterday claimed it was "delighted" to have exceeded a £190,000 target of raising cash from "sponsorship and other funding sources".
However, the projected budget for the event produced just four months ago stated that the £190,000 would come exclusively from corporate sponsorship. A further £25,000 was due to be paid by the MoD but the budget made no mention of Scottish Government money going towards the event.
New details, however, reveal that the MoD and Scottish Government will each now pay £80,000.
Mark Ruskell, Green councillor for Stirling, said last night: "It's crystal clear that commercial sponsors were not given nearly enough lead-in time to contribute funding following the announcement of Stirling's bid to host the event last year."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article