It was either a malicious call or an 'owler of a mistake.
An Aberdeenshire resident called the Scottish SPCA with concerns for an owl that had been left tied to a tree all night, only for an inspector to find the distressed bird was in fact a plastic garden water feature.
Scotland's animal welfare charity received the anonymous call on Tuesday but staff are unsure whether the call may have been made maliciously or by a well-meaning, but short-sighted, neighbour.
Chief Inspector John Carle said: "I had a feeling as soon as I approached the property that something wasn't quite right.
"The front garden contained a number of ornaments and decorative features and when I spoke to the occupant she took me to the rear of the house where the owl in question was being stored.
"It was immediately clear to me that the animal was obviously not real so I have to say that I'm more inclined to think that the call may have been made as a prank.
"We occasionally receive call-outs of this nature from individuals with genuine concerns for animals, only to find that the animal in question is a toy or an ornament.
"Last year one of our animal rescue officers was called to a resident property in Kingswells, Aberdeen, after a resident found a snake in her loft. It turned out that the snake was in fact part of an Adam and Eve fancy dress costume left there by a previous tenant.
"We also had an instance in Glasgow where we were called to rescue a baby alligator from a roundabout, which was in fact a plastic toy.
"In both cases the callers were mortified and genuinely believed the animals they'd seen were real.
"We do tend to have a giggle about this sort of thing, particular as our job investigating cruelty and rescuing abandoned and neglected animals is normally quite stressful and often upsetting.
"However, on a serious note, we are receiving a huge volume of callouts every day, so prank calls of any kind not only waste our time and our supporters donations, but could delay us in reaching an animal that desperately needs our help."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article