More than £9 million has been paid to Police Scotland over the past year by different organisations to cover the costs of hundreds of officers across the country.
The Scottish Conservatives, who obtained the figures, warned yesterday that officer numbers could come under threat if the groups became unhappy and withdrew the money.
Edinburgh City Council, which provides £2.7 million said last year that they were considering cutting £500,000 because, since the creation of Police Scotland, it no longer has influence over how these officers are deployed.
About £9.3 million came from bodies such as local authorities, the Scottish Government and private firms to supply 377 police officers.
The Tories have warned that the removal of external funding could jeopardise the Scottish Government's commitment to maintain an extra 1,000 police officers. This political pledge means officer numbers have to be at or above 17,234.
During the first five months of the new single force in 2013 there was a 49% increase in officers leaving the service - excluding those who left due to retirement, ill health or end of service - when compared with the same time period in 2012.
Scottish Conservative chief whip John Lamont MSP said: "Police Scotland's budget is already under severe pressure, and constraints are harming the frontline with the closure of service desks.
"That will become a whole lot worse if any of the millions of pounds worth of annual funding is pulled by these organisations.
"If the Scottish Government doesn't ensure the single force has the money in place to maintain the extra 1,000 officers, there could be more damaging cuts in the pipeline."
A force spokesman welcomed the support it received, adding: "If there are specific issues with the funding of officers by specific partner agencies, we will enter into discussions with them."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article