THEY have become the commuters' weapon of choice when staving off boredom and have threatened to forever change the way people read books.
But now the seemingly unassailable rise of e-books appears to have stalled with sales of digital novels declining for the first time since they appeared on the market.
Although still worth millions, the share of the market owned by e-books fell in the UK last month compared to figures from 2013, giving rise to a belief that the printed word may be making a comeback
In the UK, 3.3 million e-books were sold in April 2013, according to Nielsen research, down 0.1% on the same month the previous year, while e-book sales were worth $800 million in the US during the first few months of the year, down 5%.
The figures represent the first year-on-year decline since e-books appeared, while last month hardback book sales in the UK rose by more than 10%,
The figures prompted Tim Waterstone, the founder of the Waterstones bookshop chain, to predict that the "e-book revolution" is over and that readers are returning to print to get their fix of their favourite authors.
"E-books have developed a share of the market, of course they have," he said. "But every indication - certainly from America - shows the share is already in decline. The indications are that it will do exactly the same in the UK.
"I think you read and hear more garbage about the strength of the e-book revolution than anything else I've known."
He set up the bookshop chain in 1982 and sold it in 1993. It is now owned by Russian billionaire Alexander Mamut.
Waterstone added: "The [physical] product is so strong, the interest in reading is so deeply rooted in the culture and human soul of this country that it is immovable. The traditional, physical book is hanging on. I'm absolutely sure we will be here in 40 years' time."
But experts in Scotland say that the fall in e-book sales should come as no surprise as they have enjoyed surging growth for years and have now reached saturation point.
Campbell Brown, managing director of Edinburgh-based Black and White Publishing, said: "Sales of e-books were always going to level off at some point, and that's what we're seeing now.
"Some genres of e-books are more popular than others, such as romantic fiction.
"These sorts of books appeal to readers who read a lot of the same type of book and it is just simpler to collect them on e-book.
"E-books account for between 20-25% of our sales so they are an important part of our business, and will remain so for the foreseeable future."
Printed books remain an attractive and "sensuous" product, said bookseller Laura Mustain, who runs Byre Books in Wigtown, Scotland's official "Book Town".
She said: "We sell second-hand books and we've not really been affected by the rise in e-books. People still want the physical product.
"Older books also tend to be more attractively bound and they are things that people want on their shelves.
"And then there is the simple sensuous, tactile pleasure that comes with handling a book."
One major advantage of e-books is that they cut down on the number of novels making it on to people's bookshelves.
And they also disguise what someone is reading, said Adrian Turpin, director of the Wigtown Book Festival, meaning that no-one knows if he is reading a trashy thriller or delving into a classic.
He said: "I tend to read more trashier books on my e-book because it saves on shelf space, and a lot of people are the same.
"The idea that e-books and print are mutually exclusive is misleading as most people will read both. Readers are readers at the end of the day."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article