A Government review into the UK's nuclear deterrent options will show alternatives other than a like-for-like replacement of Trident exist, Danny Alexander has said.
The Chief Secretary to the Treasury said the two-year review, expected to be published next month, does not come to any conclusions but will show there are choices available to the country.
He said these alternatives would help nations move on from the "Cold War postures of the past".
The Liberal Democrat party leadership is against the £20 billion like-for-like replacement of the continuous at-sea nuclear deterrent and demanded an official review into other options when the coalition with the Conservatives was formed.
But the report is expected to show that the alternatives are either impractical or more expensive.
Mr Alexander, who has been leading the review for the last nine months, told BBC One's The Andrew Marr Show: "That review was completed two weeks ago and submitted to the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister.
"The question it is trying to answer is, 'Is complete renewal of Trident and the way previously planned the only way to protect our country in the future?'.
"While the review doesn't come to any conclusions, I think when we publish the results in a few weeks time people will see that there are choices available to this country.
"There are alternatives where we can - as President Obama said in Berlin last week - move on from the Cold War postures of the past and try and set out a new future for this country with a deterrent that is credible, but where this country can play a role in supporting disarmament in future."
Research for a parliamentary committee last week found more Lib Dem voters back replacing Trident if a cheaper alternative is not viable than those who would oppose it.
In a series of polls for the Public Administration Select Committee, Lib Dem backing for four new submarines reached 47% after voters were shown information about Trident and asked to decided what they would support if the Government rules that alternative systems are not an option, while 42% wanted disarmament.
The research by YouGov was commissioned to look into deliberative polling, which repeatedly asks voters the same set of questions but presents them with additional information and arguments throughout the process.
MPs urged the Government to use the system to build up a more accurate picture of voter beliefs which could then be used to influence policy-making.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article