CLAIMS that an inquiry into allegations of bullying on the island of Canna was not independent have been dismissed by the National Trust for Scotland.
The trust has rejected complaints the inquiry headed up by Janette Young was not fair because she once had a consultancy role in the organisation.
Four families left the island citing the "intoler-able" manner of the NTS's island manager, Stewart Connor, as the main reason, leaving a population of 12.
However, the NTS issued a statement last week saying: "Claims of bullying and harassment made against Stewart Connor have not been upheld following an extensive independent investigation."
It went on to say the investigation was carried out by HR Routes Limited (whose founder and director is Ms Young) and had involved written submissions, phone interviews and face-to-face meetings with existing and former residents.
Duncan Spence and his family arrived on Canna in June 2011 but left in February 2012, pointing the finger at Mr Connor. Mr Spence questioned the NTS statement, highlighting the fact the "independent investigator", according to Linked In, was the interim human resource director at the NTS until May 2011.
However, Jim Whyteside, NTS's head of communications, said: "Janette took on the role of acting HR director for the trust on a temporary, consultancy basis. She was engaged in November 2009 initially as a consultant to manage an HR re-location project and, following the resignation of the preceding HR director, provided coverage for the role until the appointment of George Wilson in 2010."
He said in that period Ms Young had no involvement in Canna and her report was compiled independently of the NTS's management team. "Her independ- ence is further guaranteed by her being bound on a professional basis by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development's code of conduct. Any claims the investigation is somehow compromised are wholly predictable and also wholly wrong."
Ms Young declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article