OFFICERS who left members of the public to confront Lee Rigby's murderers while they waited for armed back-up would have been killed if they had intervened, the Metropolitan Police's counter-terrorist chief has said.
Witnesses urged them to take action against knife-wielding Michael Adebolajo, and Michael Adebowale, who was armed with a gun, in the wake of the murder.
In the 14 minutes from the first 999 call that it took for armed officers to arrive, several members of the public had come close to Adebolajo, who stood ranting at cameras with bloodied hands, and his fellow killer Adebowale.
Head of counter-terrorism for Scotland Yard, assistant commissioner Cressida Dick, said that the unarmed officers had faced an agonising decision.
"It is a horrible dilemma for any police officer in such a circumstance whether to intervene or not intervene," she said. "I think there was good command and control, there was good decision-making, and my personal view is that it is extremely likely that if an unarmed officer had attended and tried to intervene we would be dealing with more murders."
When armed officers arrived on the scene, they had only seconds to react as Adebolajo charged at them clutching a meat cleaver, with Adebowale looking on and brandishing a gun.
The female driver of the BMW was unable to reach her Glock pistol in time, leaving her colleagues to fire at Adebolajo, who was sent flying into the air by the force of the bullets, and then shoot Adebowale.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article