UNIVERSITY graduates generate less revenue for the taxpayer for every pound of funding than those who take top-level apprenticeships, a new study claims.
Those who get degrees from "new" universities -institutions dating from 1992 onwards - deliver £51 to the public purse for every pound of investment, compared to £85 provided by so-called "higher" apprentices, according to the report.
Campaign group Million Jobs said university graduates as a whole generated a return of £57 per pound of investment, 27 per cent less than those who complete top-level apprenticeships.
The only "new" university degree course to provide a more favourable per pound return compared to higher apprentices is medicine at £86 per pound of investment, the report said.
Higher apprenticeships incorporate work-based learning programmes and lead to a qualification ranging from the equivalent to a higher education certificate up to master's degrees.
The report blamed lower returns associated with university degrees, particularly those from post-1992 universities, on factors including graduate debt being written off, differences in earnings and the "considerably larger" investment required to produce returns compared to those for apprenticeships.
Richard Grice, chief executive of Pera Training, which provides manufacturing apprenticeships, said the study "underlines the dismal taxpayer returns at some ends of the higher education spectrum".
Marion Osborne, director of the Million Jobs campaign, said: "A degree is often not the most effective route to maximise employment prospects."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article