SCOTTISH universities have accused funding chiefs of undermining the sector's international competitiveness after an unexpected funding cut of more than £16 million.
Universities Scotland, which represents university principals, issued the warning after the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) said it plans 2% efficiency cuts.
The university sector had been expecting a total funding settlement for teaching and research of £852m in 2013/14 after a 2.5% rise. However, now institutions will get £835m with a 0.5% hike – below inflation.
The SFC said it plans to reinvest the money, with the expectation it could be used to pay for extra places for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Alastair Sim, director of Universities Scotland, said: "This is not about crying poverty. Universities did well in the spending review precisely because the Scottish Government made it a priority to find the funds to keep us on an internationally competitive footing.
"The SFC implemented the spending review settlement in its March 2012 grant letter to institutions, stating that it would secure the competitiveness of the Scottish system within the UK and internationally and clearly setting out increases of 2.5% for next year.
"We were, therefore, very surprised when the SFC announced in October that it intended to take a 2% efficiency saving off core grants for teaching, knowledge exchange and research."
However, Laurence Howells, a senior director at the SFC, said: "In the context of the difficult public spending environment we do not think it's unreasonable to expect universities to make efficiencies, especially as this will be re-invested into the sector to improve opportunities for learners."
Robin Parker, president of NUS Scotland, added: "As far as we understand, these 2% efficiencies are not about reducing the overall funding to universities at all. Instead they're about getting more for the huge sums of money we quite rightly invest, and in particular increasing the opportunities available to people to study at university across Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article