The Royal Navy reportedly wants to ask American squadrons to fly off its new aircraft carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth II, following delays in the introduction of Britain's new F35B fighters.
Ministry of Defence (MoD) sources said that the US Marine Corps will be offered the use of the ship for flight operations, according to BBC Newsnight.
Currently the UK plans to have its first F35 squadron operational by 2018, and one ready for service at sea by 2021. Even if this is achieved, there will be several years where the Queen Elizabeth is ready but British squadrons are not.
For the past year defence analysts had been expecting the MoD to order 14 of the new jets, but persistent doubts about the F35's enormously complex software - and an engine fire this summer - have caused successive delays.
When the British buy was announced last month, it was for just four of the planes. The MoD says that this order will allow trials to start from the Queen Elizabeth on time with, "UK F35Bs, flown by UK pilots."
But the slowdown in the expected purchasing rate is bound to delay the aircraft's entry into service, say defence insiders. The MoD told Newsnight that it is "not aware" of any further delay to the timetable for the first operational squadron.
Even if the timetable is kept, senior naval officers are nervous that a gap in capability from 2018 to 2021, coming at a time when the defence budget will come under pressure after the next general election, could damage their chances of keeping two new carriers and remaining a 'first division naval power.' The report suggested decisions relating to the new ships, including their communications fit, are now on hold until next year's Strategic Defence and Security Review.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article