A total of 282 people had their voicemails accessed 6813 times, according to data presented to the hacking trial.
Detective Constable Richard Fitzgerald examined billing data from private investigator Glenn Mulcaire's phone, two communal lines at the News of the World and the phone of former royal editor Clive Goodman.
Data from 191 days in 2005 and 2006 showed Mulcaire made 1450 calls to 87 voicemails plus messages accessed via an Orange platform to 45 numbers, DC Fitzgerald told the Old Bailey.
He also said call data from two News International internal phones between 2004 and 2006 showed 4714 calls to 98 voicemails, with more calls made to access messages of 37 customers via the Orange platform.
Data from Goodman's home number showed 649 calls to 14 voicemail numbers between January 2005 to August 2006, the officer said.
Later the trial heard Rebekah Brooks discussed paying £200,000 a year to PR guru Max Clifford to back out of a civil case.
The disclosure emerged in notes from a meeting of senior executives of News International in January 2010, read to the court by prosecutor Andrew Edis QC.
Brooks reported that she had got Mr Clifford to agree £200,000 per annum to "represent the Sun/do business with the Sun" and if that was put in writing, he would call off his lawyers, the Old Bailey heard.
Rebekah Brooks, former News International chief executive, denies conspiring to hack phones, conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office, and conspiring to pervert the course of justice.
Andy Coulson, 46, of Charing, Kent denies conspiring to hack phones as the tabloid's ex-managing editor Stuart Kuttner, 73, from Woodford Green, Essex.
He also denies two allegations that he conspired with Goodman, 56, from Addlestone in Surrey, and other unknown people to commit misconduct in public office.
All seven defendants in the trial deny the charges.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article