READERS of Peru's most influential newspaper El Comercio are divided on whether Michaella McCollum Connolly and Melissa Reid should be jailed if found guilty, or deported back to Britain.
Both young women claim they were forced at gunpoint by gangsters to carry the drugs.
One reader of the newspaper wrote: "Now they're crying. Should they be pardoned because of pressure from the European media?
"No-one threatened them, at least there is no evidence of that, but we did see film footage of their arrogance when they were arrested."
Another wrote: "Everyone knows there's a lot of drugs, alcohol, etc in Ibiza. There are wild parties there and their alleged captivity [in Ibiza] sounds like a tall story to me."
According to Peru's drug squad, 248 mules carrying 1581 kilos of cocaine were intercepted last year at Lima's Jorge Chavez International Airport while trying to board aircraft bound for Europe. The majority of the mules were Spanish citizens, followed by Peruvians, Mexicans, Italians, Colombians and Bulgarians, in that order.
McCollum Connolly and Reid were detained by drug enforcement officials at the airport after being detected by a sniffer dog.
Prison conditions in Peru are notoriously tough, and if convicted the women could face many years behind bars.
One El Comercio reader expressed the view that Reid and McCollum Connolly should be freed "and allowed to return home if it is proven that they were forced to transport the drugs", while another added: "They're kids, they should be deported, but not before being given the fright of their lives."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article