RAMBLERS have launched yet another attack on the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) after planning permission was granted for the final section of a nature trail.
Perth and Kinross Council approved the completion of Loch Leven Heritage Trail yesterday, but Ramblers Scotland claimed it was not the best route.
The walking group has been locked in a dispute with the RSPB over the location of the trail, which they claim should cut across the reserve instead of circling around the periphery.
Group director Dave Morris welcomed the move to finish the four mile walking/cycling trail, including the construction of a bridge at Loch Leven, but criticised the RSPB over its layout.
He said: "This is an important milestone in the completion of this project, which will provide an outstanding recreational experience for anyone visiting Kinross and the surrounding area.
"However, the route as approved goes around the periphery of the RSPB reserve and is too long, too exposed to bad weather, too steep and too close to the B9097 for much of its length.
"The proposed ramblers' route would be much more direct and would cross the RSPB reserve, giving a much better experience.
"If mitigation measures are put in place, we are not convinced that the levels of disturbance to the wildlife would be as great as suggested by the RSPB."
A spokesman for RSPB Scotland said: "The route provides great views of the loch as well as the wonderful wildlife it supports. The trail will also attract new visitors, bringing economic benefits to the area."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article