CHILD poverty costs Scotland's largest council almost £400 million a year, a new report has claimed.
Researchers said the cost of the problem is £395m annually in the Glasgow City Council area – the third highest in the UK.
The cost of child poverty was said to be highest in Birmingham, at £914m a year, followed by Manchester, at £446m a year.
An estimated 36,367 children in the Glasgow City Council area are living below the poverty line, according to the research.
John Dickie, head of the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) in Scotland, urged councils to protect families from poverty.
CPAG asked Loughborough University experts, who have already estimated the national cost of child poverty, to produce a breakdown of its impact on every local authority in the UK.
Across the UK, child poverty is said to cost £29 billion a year.
This includes £15bn spent on services to deal with the consequences of the problem, £3.5bn in lost tax receipts from people earning less as a result of having grown up in poverty and £2bn on benefits for people spending more time out of work as a result of having grown up in poverty.
In addition, £8.5bn is lost from people's earnings as a result of having grown up in poverty.
Researchers put the cost of the problem in the Edinburgh City Council area at £156m a year, with the impact in Fife at £158m.
In North Lanarkshire, it was estimated to cost £170m but in Perth and Kinross it was £33m and in Stirling it was £26m. In both the Orkney Islands and the Shetland Islands, the cost was £4m a year.
Mr Dickie said it was crucial councils did everything possible to help families. He suggested removing childcare barriers to work, ensuring families have access to benefits and tax credits advice and extending free school meals and clothing grants.
He added: "Reducing child poverty benefits everyone by cutting the costs to local authority services and boosting the local economy. Many will be shocked to hear that so many children in every area are living in poverty."
A spokesman for Glasgow City Council said it was not clear from the report how figures about projected costs were arrived at.
However, he said child poverty was well recognised by the council and added: "Improvements are being made to the lives of those most affected by deprivation."
He added: "A wide range of initiatives is being undertaken to support children and families in Glasgow, and many of the recommendations in the report, such as a living wage, have already been introduced by the council.
"We are committed to tackling poverty and health inequalities and through our long-term strategy of focusing on jobs and the economy, targeted support for the vulnerable, the early years and education, we hope to bring lasting change to the city."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said it was doing everything it could to address social inequalities. While figures released by the Scottish Government last month showed a fall in the number of children in poverty in 2011/12, she said there was "no room for complacency".
She warned "changes introduced through the UK Government's cuts to capital budgets and welfare reform agenda threaten to have a significant impact on children".
The spokeswoman said the Scottish Government was "working to strengthen the economy and to secure new jobs and opportunities to our communities" and added: "We are also improving the quality and flexibility of early learning and childcare support, through the Children and Young People (Scotland) Bill.
"This government is taking forward a programme of work to create a fairer, more equal Scotland.""
Katrine Bussey
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article