RETAILERS are making potentially dangerous mistakes when installing child car seats, with even the best failing two thirds of fittings, according to a report.
An undercover investigation by Which? found that 90 per cent of the stores it visited failed to fit the car seats correctly.
Experts visited 42 stores across the UK and asked staff to fit two different car seats, with just four managing to fit both properly while 13 failed to ask any essential questions beforehand.
The watchdog said the retailers Babies R Us and Mamas & Papas each failed 11 of the 12 fittings with "a catalogue of mistakes" while Kiddicare failed nine.
Some of the errors included fitting the seat with the support leg still folded under the base of the seat and one seat not attached to the car securely enough because the fitter did not know how to install it properly using the seat belt.
However, Which? said all the stores it visited had room to improve, with Halfords managing just two successful fittings, Mothercare three and John Lewis, the best of the major retailers, failing two thirds of its installations.
Independent stores did slightly better and achieved the most successful fittings with seven out of 12, but the Which? experts thought their advice was not as comprehensive as it should have been.
The consumer group said the majority of staff it saw did not spend enough time fitting and explaining how to use the car seats.
Mamas & Papas told Which? it had worked "incredibly hard" to educate store colleagues about car seat safety. Babies R Us said it would build and strengthen training.
John Lewis said car seat fitting was mandatory training and Halfords said it had accredited fitting courses with annual refreshers.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article