A wealthy property developer's wife is to receive over £1.6m in a settlement worked out after a judge urged the couple to spend no more money on their divorce battle after legal costs reached a "crazy" and "absolutely barmy" £300,000-plus.
Mark Joel, 53, has agreed to pay Georgina Wendy Scobling-Joel, 42, a series of lump sums in a "clean-break" deal worked out at the doors of the court after the judge warned them the costs would "probably double" if they fought on.
High Court family division judge Mr Justice Holman welcomed the settlement reached by the Joels, whose marital home was in Walton-on-Thames, Surrey, saying: "I am very, very, very pleased that good sense has broken out.
"There has been constructive dialogue and no doubt they have been extremely well advised on both sides, enabling them to move forward and put this behind them - and stop further haemorrhaging in legal costs.
"This is a fair and wise outcome".
The cost-conscious judge contrasted the Joel settlement with what he described as the "unseemly" case of Russian beauty queen Ekaterina Parfenova that he had tried last week and was "plastered all over the newspapers".
Despite his best efforts to get the couple to settle, the bitter divorce battle went the full distance before he awarded Ms Parfenova a £3.3m payout against her husband Richard Fields, an American lawyer.
Legal expenses topped £1m and the judge described what had occurred as "unedifying" and like "a boxing match".
The judge said: "Between them they have incurred, inclusive of VAT, £387,500 in costs - that would pay for a very nice flat in Islington or Clapham."
They had chosen to pay lawyers rather than "put money where it matters" and that was "crazy", he said.
Taking the husband's estimate of his assets, the judge added: "That is 12% of his assets going into legal fees. It is absolutely barmy."
Later Ms Scobling-Joel said: "I would like to thank my absolutely amazing professional team - and a professional, first-class judge."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article