The widow of the late Iain Banks, who died at the age of 59, has written about how he wrote his last book, The Quarry, which is published this week.
Adele Hartley, who married the writer of fiction and science fiction shortly after he announced in April that he had cancer, said his final novel is beautiful and "all the more devastating because in the end Iain came to know his character's story just a little too well".
The Quarry centres around the story of Guy, a man dying of cancer – but its story was not inspired by the writer's own illness, she writes.
She says, on the website Banksophilia, which was set up to record the messages of fans and also impart information about the author's illness: "Iain's story became something you could never put in a book – certainly something he never would have.
"He was horrified at the idea of putting a person or event from his real life directly into any work of fiction as it would have been a slight on the power of his imagination.
"Had he known he had cancer, he would never have written about it."
The Herald's literary editor, Rosemary Goring, reviewed the book and said it had passage of "throat-catching pathos" and adds: "The Quarry reaches a pitch of emotion that only a reader made of granite could read without tears."
Banks, who died on June 9, conceived his final book, to be published by Little Brown, in the early summer of last year, Ms Hartley says, and plotted it through the autumn.
Ms Hartley writes: "There were so many moments in our life together when we'd look at something or overhear something and say to each other 'you could never put that in a book' quite simply because no-one would believe that it was likely or possible.
"Real life can be funny like that."
She concludes: "The vicious irony of the situation wasn't lost on either one of us."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article