Plans for a 25-turbine windfarm in the Ochil Hills have emerged just weeks after images of the picturesque landscape were beamed around the world from the Ryder Cup.
Tourism chiefs claim the golf tournament could bring more than £82 million into the economy, but campaigners fear the 415ft high turbines will ruin the landscape and scupper the expected tourism boost.
The windfarm would be the largest in a region already home to several sizeable wind energy developments.
Developer PNE Wind Ltd wants to install as many as 25 turbines of up to 415ft high in the hills. Its North Hill windfarm scheme is being brought forward in conjunction with the Forestry Commission Scotland.
David Gibson. chief officer of the Mountaineering Council of Scotland has branded the development "ill-advised".
Objecting to the plans in a letter to the developers, he wrote: "We consider North Hill to be a particularly egregious and ill-advised proposal.
"This would be a significantly larger windfarm, with significantly larger turbines, than any existing in the Ochil Hills."
He also noted that the location, four miles south of the village of Dunning, overlapped two previous windfarm application sites, both of which were refused planning permission.
Culminative impact could prove to one of the key issues in deciding whether the new scheme is approved because the 21-turbine Burnfoot Windfarm, 18-turbine Lochelbank Windfarm and 12-turbine Green Knowes Windfarm are all within a six-mile radius.
A Gleneagles Hotel spokeswoman said bosses at the hotel and resort had recently become aware of the windfarm plan and the implcations were being considered.
A spokesman from PNE Wind UK said: "The proposals are at a very early stage and we will be working closely with key stakeholders and the community to ensure we can deliver a windfarm that is sensitively designed to the natural features of the site."
The firm says the scheme could generate up to 62.5MW of energy. Details are on its website at www.pnewind ukforestry.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article