WRITERS have reacted with anger to the closure of seven libraries in controversial cuts agreed by Moray Council.
The council's decision this week to cut its entire arts budget led to widespread criticism, and the Scottish Government has urged it to reconsider.
Now authors have expressed their anger at the closure of seven libraries out of 15 in the council area as part of a programme of cuts to save £30 million.
Scottish crime writer Tony Black instigated the campaign after claiming his letter of concern to council leader Allan Wright was greeted with an "arrogant one-word reply".
Black said: "I wrote to Mr Wright addressing my concerns in a reasonable way and expected to, at the very least, be given the courtesy of a proper response. Instead he issued an arrogant, one-word reply of 'noted'.
"I have watched these cuts – not just to library services but to many much-valued and essential services – night after night on the news and I just felt I had to act.
"We cannot continue to erode our societal structure to this extent. Where does it stop? It's always the vulnerable, the needy and the easy targets they go for too."
Fellow author Mark Billingham added: "Everyone knows libraries are crucial to our cultural well-being, but in many cases they are also the heart of a local community.
"Closing them is beyond ridiculous; it's obscene."
Novelist Douglas Jackson said: "I think it's an absolute disgrace. It's an attack on literacy, because these will be libraries in rural areas, where alternative access to books won't be readily available.
"I hope the people of Moray surprise the Philistines on the council and campaign to have the decision overturned."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article