The Forth rail bridge has been voted Scotland's favourite example of engineering.
The 125-year-old construction spanning the Firth of Forth became a world heritage site earlier this year.
The latest award comes in a survey of 1,000 Scots commissioned by the low carbon infrastructure taskforce, which is working to develop new "green" infrastructure projects.
The Forth bridge gained 49% of the vote while the Glenfinnan viaduct, used in the Harry Potter films, came second with 13%. Other engineering projects that featured included the Glasgow subway and the Falkirk Wheel.
The taskforce has also published a report calling for new high speed rail and energy schemes to become the "engineering projects for the 21st century and beyond".
Sara Thiam, chair of the taskforce and regional director of the Institution of Civil Engineers, said: "The Forth bridge continues to be an icon of civil engineering excellence and we're delighted that it has captured the public's imagination in this way.
"The bridge is a great example of how engineering expertise can be used to create infrastructure which stands the test of time and shapes the way we live well into the future."
Dr Katherine Trebeck, taskforce member and global research and policy advisor at Oxfam, said: "Scotland can take the lead, not just in reducing our carbon emissions and environmental impact, but in developing and sharing the solutions that will help end fuel poverty, improve health and create jobs.
"It's great to see that three-quarters of the people polled also said they wanted to see investment in low carbon projects for the future.
"We hope people across Scotland will now show their support for their favourite projects for the future, as identified in the taskforce's long-list."
More than 4,500 men were employed in the construction of the Forth Bridge, which took eight years to complete and used 53,000 tonnes of steel.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here