by Tony Jones
AN academic and a screenwriter who were instrumental in the discovery of Richard III’s remains have said the Queen was fascinated by their story.
The Queen presented Edinburgh-based writer Philippa Langley and historian John Ashdown-Hill with MBEs for spearheading a campaign to locate the Plantagenet monarch in 2009, eventually tracing him to a car park in Leicester.
Speaking after the Buckingham Palace investiture ceremony, Ms Langley, said: “The Queen was fascinated by the whole project. She asked if we always thought he was buried in Leicester and I confirmed we did.
“I said once we’d gone into the research, the car park looked like a real possibility, it was a hypothesis, but a real possibility.
“She said ‘Yes, to find a king in a car park is not an everyday occurrence’.”
The remains were unearthed in September 2012, and they were confirmed as those of Richard following a wealth of evidence gathered from historical documents, skeletal details and DNA samples, which matched those of his distant living relatives.
A legal battle over where he would be laid to rest followed after a group representing his descendants lobbied for him to be buried in York.
Eventually the funeral went ahead at Leicester Cathedral in March, with the Archbishop of Canterbury and several members of the Royal Family attending.
Ms Langley said: “By finding Richard’s remains, it’s been the most powerful counterpoint to Shakespeare and Thomas More, who said he was the hunchback with the withered arm and the limping gait – and we now know it was a complete myth.”
Ms Langley inaugurated the quest for Richard’s lost grave when her ongoing studies into the monarch switched from his life to his death after she visited Leicester, following a suggestion.
She almost had a premonition that his remains were under the car park as she walked around what was rumoured to be his last resting place.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel