Private firms providing public services should be banned from suing their critics, campaigners have urged.
A whole new breed of companies and arm's-length bodies has emerged over the last decade, doing jobs previously left to the NHS, Department of Work and Pensions or councils.
However, unlike their public-sector predecessors, these businesses have the right to sue for defamation, having a chilling effect on those in the media and beyond who wish to hold them to account.
Now campaigners at English Pen, the branch of the international writers' organisation south of the Border, have called on Scotland to close this loophole as the country moves to reform its defamation laws.
English Pen led the campaign for libel reform in England. It succeeded in persuading the old UK coalition government to introduce a rule of "serious harm" that ended frivolous attacks on free speech south of the border - but not, crucially in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Background: Why The Herald is campaigning for defamation reform.
But English Pen believes the Scottish Parliament could go even further and strip corporations and a new breed of public-private hybrid organisations of the right to sue.
Robert Sharp, the organisation's head of campaigns, said: "Private companies contracted to deliver public services can sue when their performance is criticised, even though case law says that government itself cannot sue.
"With more and more public services being delivered by private companies, the space for people to criticise how public money is spent becomes smaller and smaller.
Writing in The Herald, he added: "Unfortunately, when this problem was debated in the House of Commons, MPs failed to deal with it.
"In fact, Conservative ministers went out of their way to ensure that amendments to fix the problem were removed from the Bill.
"So this is one area of the defamation law where MSPs could act decisively where Westminster MPs failed."
Scotland has not gone down the road of privatisation quite as far as England, but some key UK-wide services are provided by the private sector, such as disability assessments.
In 2011 the company Atos sent threatening letters to websites that hosted blogs critical of its work in this sphere.
Mass housing stock transfers have seen housing associations, which can sue, take over tens of thousands of homes from councils, which can't. Last year an English housing association tried to sue Channel 4 for naming its chief executive in a programme that also featured rogue landlords. This action failed - because it did not meet the new English test of "substantial harm". There is no such test in Scotland.
The Scottish Law Commission is already reviewing legislation amid concerns that the country had fallen behind changes in England and Wales that make it harder for the rich and powerful to sue their critics.
The Scottish Government has also sounded positive about reform.
A spokeswoman said: "We look forward to the outcome of the Scottish Law Commission’s consideration of defamation law reform and we will consider fully the terms of any report produced on this important issue.
"We will continue to engage with a range of stakeholders to inform the Scottish Government’s position on any potential reform of defamation law."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel