People are less likely to drop litter if it has eyes printed on it, researchers have found.
A study by Newcastle University revealed if a leaflet featured watching eyes then the odds of it being dropped on the floor were reduced by around two thirds.
The research follows up previous studies which found that having posters of watching eyes reduced bike thefts and littering.
The findings could be used to encourage fast food outlets to incorporate eyes into their packaging to reduce litter.
In the latest experiment, researchers made two leaflets, one featuring a prominent image of watching eyes and the same leaflet with the eyes obscured.
Even with no mention of littering, the simple image of the eyes deterred people from dropping the leaflets.
In a paper published in the journal PeerJ, experts showed that just 4.7% of people dropped the leaflet with eyes compared to 15.6% of those handed the other leaflets.
The research was led by Professor Melissa Bateson and Professor Daniel Nettle, of the Centre for Behaviour and Evolution.
Professor Nettle said: "Our work shows that the presence of eye images can encourage co-operative behaviour and we think this is because people feel they are being watched.
"As we care what other people think about us, we behave better and more honestly when we feel we are being observed."
Professor Bateson added: "In the fight against anti-social littering, this study could be a real help.
"Fast food retailers might want to think about using it on packaging to discourage people discarding the wrappers.
"The flip side is, for those handing out leaflets, it could help people take in the messages are they are less likely to throw away a flyer with eyes on."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here