Cats with black and white patches have their distinctive colouring determined in the womb, research suggests.
The study found the two-tone fur colour, known as piebald, forms when pigment cells fail to follow instructions during early development.
Scientists hope the research will enhance understanding of medical conditions such as holes in the heart, which are also caused by problems with cell movements in the womb.
Piebald patches, also apparent in some horses, occurs when pigment cells move and multiply randomly as an embryo grows, without complex cell-to-cell communication sending them in one direction.
As there are not enough pigment cells to cover the whole of the skin, the animal gets a white belly, the study said.
The University of Edinburgh's Dr Richard Mort said: ''We already know cells move through the developing skin to create pigment. We have discovered that they move and multiply at random which is not what was expected.
"Using a mathematical model we were then able to show that this simple process could explain piebald patterns.''
This mathematical model could now be used for further research tracking different cells during early development.
Researchers at the Universities of Bath and Edinburgh carried out the research on mice and believe it debunks earlier theories that the odd colouring is the result of slow-moving pigment cells.
The University of Bath's Dr Christian Yates said: "Piebald patterns can be caused by a faulty version of a gene called kit. What we have found is counter-intuitive.
"Previously it was thought that the defective kit gene slowed cells down, but instead we've shown that it actually reduces the rate at which they multiply.
"There are too few pigment cells to populate the whole of the skin and so the animal gets a white belly.
"In addition to kit, there are many other genes that can create piebald patterns, the mathematical model can explain piebald patterns regardless of the genes involved.''
The findings were published in the journal Nature Communications.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here