The Government is set to come under fresh pressure to resolve the case of Julian Assange after a United Nations working group decision that the WikiLeaks founder is being unlawfully detained.
Mr Assange has been living in the Ecuadorian embassy in London for more than three years and has been granted political asylum by the Ecuador government.
He believes he will be transported to the United States to be quizzed over the activities of WikiLeaks if he is extradited to Sweden. There is an espionage case against him in the US.
He filed a complaint against Sweden and the UK in September 2014 which has been considered by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention.
The decision will be published formally tomorrow but it will be in Mr Assange's favour, sparking calls for the UK and Sweden to release him.
Swedish prosecutors said the ruling will have no impact on its investigation, while the UK government will argue that it is an opinion rather than a legally binding decision.
Sweden's foreign ministry confirmed that the UN panel will rule that Mr Assange has been the victim of "arbitrary" detention inside the embassy in the Knightsbridge area of London.
It is expected that the panel will say that the key elements of its decision include the inability of Mr Assange to access the benefit of political asylum, the fact that he has never been charged, the length of time he has been inside the embassy, and changes to UK law and procedures which have happened since he first arrived at the embassy.
The group of legal experts has made previous rulings on whether imprisonment or detention is lawful, which have led to people being released.
Mr Assange's legal team is due to give a news conference in central London tomorrow shortly after the UN decision is confirmed.
They say the WikiLeaks founder would like to attend the conference in person, but it is more likely he will appear via a video link unless there is a sudden change of heart by the police and the UK government.
Mr Assange had said he would hand himself over to police for arrest on Friday if the UN group ruled that he had not been unlawfully detained.
The Metropolitan Police have said they will make "every effort" to arrest the WikiLeaks founder should he leave the embassy.
Mr Assange is wanted for questioning in Sweden over one allegation of sexual assault, which he has always denied, and is fighting against extradition.
He was granted political asylum by Ecuador and has remained in their embassy since 2012.
Police have ended a 24 hour guard outside the embassy, but the building remains under covert surveillance.
A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: "The operation to arrest Julian Assange does however continue and should he leave the embassy the MPS will make every effort to arrest him."
A Foreign Office spokesman said: "We will not pre-empt any opinions from the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention.
"We have been consistently clear that Mr Assange has never been arbitrarily detained by the UK but is, in fact, voluntarily avoiding lawful arrest by choosing to remain in the Ecuadorean embassy.
"An allegation of rape is still outstanding and a European Arrest Warrant in place, so the UK continues to have a legal obligation to extradite Mr Assange to Sweden."
A Downing Street spokesman declined to comment on leaks of the UN panel's reported finding, saying the Government would not respond until its official publication.
But he added that the findings will not be "legally binding", adding: "There is a European arrest warrant currently in place and we have a legal obligation to put that into effect."
The spokesman added: "(Mr Assange) has never been detained in this country, so there is not arbitrary detention. He is avoiding lawful arrest by choosing to remain in the Ecuadorean embassy."
Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Alistair Carmichael said: "Liberal Democrats have always said Julian Assange should return to Sweden to face the allegations against him in a fair trial.
"The UK has a legal obligation to fulfil a European Arrest Warrant to extradite Mr Assange and it is vital that the Government sees this through."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here