BBC star Evan Davis has praised hydrotherapy for dogs during a bizarre on-air discussion.
The pet pampering emerged as he spoke to fellow presenter Justin Webb on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.
Webb's dog Toffee recently swallowed a sock and required £5,000 worth of treatment at a pet hospital in Potters Bar, Hertfordshire.
Although the care was covered by insurance, it triggered a debate on the scale of vet bills.
Webb said he regarded it as an "ethical" decision.
"You think of all the things that money should be spent on in the modern world, and you think 'Hang on a second, is this the right way to spend it?'" he said.
Davis said his dog, Mr Whippy, who was in the studio with him, broke his leg when young and treatment had cost more than £4,000 - again covered by insurance.
"When we got the dog I thought 'Look, he's like a watch. If the repair is going to cost more than the new one...' - he cost 500 quid, this little mutt - if it's going to cost more to repair it then you basically throw the dog away and get a new one," he said.
"But of course once you've got the dog you don't think that way."
Davis, who also presents Dragons' Den, added: "When we got the dog we were never going to be one of these stupid owners who gets hydrotherapy for the dog, but when we did get hydrotherapy for the dog it really made a difference."
He said when considering such spending it was natural to ask: "Is this silly?"
But Davis went on: "If you compare the dog's leg to the life of a small child in a poor country obviously the child prevails.
"But if you compare the dog's leg to a holiday, the dog's leg - I would pay for the dog's leg any day, no problem."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here