Agents of the security services may be responsible for the bullying and abuse of critics of Jeremy Corbyn in an attempt to stir up trouble for the Labour leader, the Unite trade union boss Len McCluskey has claimed.
Mr McCluskey, a strong supporter Mr Corbyn, said the security services had a history of "dark practices" and suggested "right-wingers" in disguise may be responsible for the actions attributed to the Labour leader's supporters.
READ MORE: MI5 spies told: stay out of referendum
"Do people believe for one second that the security forces are not involved in dark practices?" he told The Guardian.
"We found out just a couple of years ago that the chair of my union then, the Transport and General Workers Union, was an MI5 informant at the time that there was a strike taking place that I personally as a worker was involved in.
READ MORE: Corbyn denies he is a bully as Labour infighting intensifies
"(In) 1972, I was on strike for six weeks. And 30 years later it comes out that the chair of my union at that time was an MI5 informant."
"Anybody who thinks that that isn't happening doesn't live in the same world that I live in. Do you think that there's not all kinds of right-wingers who are not secretly able to disguise themselves and stir up trouble? I find it amazing if people think that isn't happening."
Mr McCluskey accused MPs and others in the party who had complained of death threats and intimidation of exaggerating the problem.
READ MORE: MI5 spies told: stay out of referendum
"There's a hysteria being whipped up. A few people say things they shouldn't and then it's blown up out of all proportion, to suit the imagery that the Labour party has somehow become a cesspit, and suddenly it's a crisis," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article