ROYAL Bank of Scotland has reached a final settlement with a US regulator to resolve two civil lawsuits totalling £846 million launched over claims it sold toxic residential mortgage-backed securities to two credit unions which later collapsed.
The National Credit Union Administration Board confirmed the settlement, which related to the RBS subsidiary RBS Securities Inc's dealings with US Central Federal Credit Union and Western Corporate Federal Credit Union.
The bank said that settlement amount, which has not been disclosed, has already been accounted for.
RBS sold the mortgage securities to the US Central Federal Credit Union and Western Corporate Federal Credit Union, but the bonds later proved toxic and failed after the US housing bubble burst in 2008.
The bank, which does not admit fault under the deal, said the settlement is "substantially" covered by the £3.8 billion already put aside to cover upcoming litigation.
But RBS still faces potentially mammoth settlements over mis-selling of mortgage securities turned sour in the US, with claims still outstanding with the Federal Housing Finance Agency and US Department of Justice (DoJ).
RBS boss Ross McEwan said at a conference in London on Tuesday that the group was working to resolve outstanding claims this year and into 2017, but warned it could create "substantial additional conduct provisions and noise".
Banking experts believe the DoJ settlement could total around £9 billion.
Its shares have been under pressure after the DoJ hit German rival Deutsche Bank with a 14 billion US dollar (£10.8 billion) penalty for mis-selling mortgage-backed securities.
Fears over the impact on Deutsche Bank have sent its shares tumbling close to 30-year lows.
RBS, which is still 73% owned by the Government, reiterated in the latest settlement announcement that ongoing lawsuits might force it to put more cash aside.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here