Edinburgh wants to install a 'transient visitor tax', or hotel bed charge, as early as April next year.
As part of the forthcoming £1.5bn City Deal which Edinburgh City Council is likely to sign with the UK Government in March, the council is lobbying to be given power to install the charge to raise millions of pounds a year for culture spending in the capital.
Andrew Burns, leader of the city council, yesterday said he is optimistic the City Deal - which also includes Fife, West Lothian East Lothian, Midlothian and Scottish Borders councils - could be ratified both by the council and Governments in March and include the new taxation power.
Read more: Edinburgh could become first Scottish city to introduce tourist tax
This week the former SNP minister, Kenny MacAskill, said the "time has come" to introduce a nightly tourist levy, an idea also backed by Labour.
The term "transient visitor levy", or TVL, is being used as the name for the charge in Edinburgh, a duty which could be added to restaurant as well as hotel bills.
The money raised annually would be specifically ring-fenced for cultural spending, Mr Burns said.
A charge of £1 or £2 per hotel room per night could raise £10m for the city, previous estimates have said.
Aberdeen City Council is also in favour of installing a charge, while Glasgow has investigated it as a local taxation option.
However, the Scottish Government has not supported the idea thus far and could block any new tax raising power in the City Deal.
Fergus Linehan, director of the Edinburgh International Festival, has backed the concept, as has John Donnelly, chief executive of Marketing Edinburgh and Councillor Richard Lewis, culture convenor.
Read more: Edinburgh could become first Scottish city to introduce tourist tax
A new document on the City Deal notes: "The City Region Deal creative/cultural proposition [includes] enhanced investment in destination marketing, festivals and cultural infrastructure, potentially through a Transient Visitor Levy or a suitable alternative fiscal mechanism."
Cities across the world use a nightly hotel bed tax, including Berlin, Barcelona, Paris, Rome, Bruges and Dubai.
Bath, in Somerset in England, is considering the idea of a transient visitor levy, which would make it the first city in the UK.
Mr Burns said: "I am very strongly in favour of it.
"I don't think it would put people off coming here, personally.
"In the current climate it would alleviate huge pressure on us - our festivals and events go from strength to strength, but... we cannot rest on our laurels, we are being chased by loads of other big cities that have significant events and Edinburgh cannot just assume it will have the pre-eminent position it's got at the moment, and that requires money.
"A modest levy, or transient visitor levy, would provide several millions of pounds every single year that would be re-invested back into the cultural offering."
Read more: Edinburgh could become first Scottish city to introduce tourist tax
The new power would need to be approved in Parliament but Mr Burns said it could be installed as early as April 2018.
He added: "In this chamber, there is all party support for the idea.
"The reluctance to date has been at Government, not just the SNP but the previous Labour/Liberal Democrat government.
"But I think the reluctance has always been about 'well if Edinburgh goes first, if Glasgow goes first, it will have a negative impact on that specific city' but I think there might be given powers to have it in Edinburgh."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "The Scottish Government has no plans to implement any new taxes on the tourism sector."
Last year Mr Linehan said that a TVL or similar would create a "virtuous circle" and said "if tourism increases, the tax increases so it can be re-invested - I think there is something very positive in that."
The Fringe Society said: "We would be keen, as we are sure many people would be, to see a proposal for a tourism tax with details such as where it would be levied and how the money would be distributed, before putting out backing to such a proposal."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel