A new report has highlighted the gender inequality of the the art world.
The online art sales site Artfinder, in a bid to stoke a wider debate on the issue, has drawn attention to the lack of female representation in the "high end art world."
Artfinder is now to write to every major art institution in the UK and the US asking them to share their data on the representation of women artists to gather more information on the issue.
They are also asking the public to go to local museums and galleries and count how many works are by men and by women and post them on social media as part of the campaign to highlight the representation of female artists.
A recent report said that only 4% of the National Gallery of Scotland's collections are by female artists, and 35% of the Tate Modern's collections.
The Artfinder report says only one of the top 100 lots sold at auction in 2015 was by a woman, and none of the top ten richest living artists are women.
It points out that the gap in value for the highest value items by male and female artists that year was $135 million (£108m) - $25 million (£20m) for Louise Bourgeois’ ‘Spider’, versus $160 million {£128m) for Picasso’s ‘Les Femmes d’Alger.
The report says the representation of women at large galleries such as MoMa in New York and the Tate was also too low.
Jonas Almgren, chief executive of Artfinder, said: "We’ve known for a long time that our [own] artists have pretty much a 50/50
gender balance, which is unusual in the art world.
"Women are still woefully underrepresented in the high-end art world and it’s remarkably overlooked as an issue.
"One of the biggest problems is a lack of reliable data, so that’s where we’re starting. As well as publishing our own data, we’re asking the world’s art institutions, museums and galleries to share their data. We know that will be a long and difficult road, but we’re taking the first step by publishing our data, and we hope that others will take on that mantle."
Artfinder works with 9000 artists and galleries.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel