The brother of Diana, Princess of Wales, has said he still has nightmares about the “harrowing” experience of her funeral.
Earl Spencer also recalled how the 1997 event must have been a “million times worse” for the Princess’ two sons William and Harry.
William, now the Duke of Cambridge, was 15 and Harry 12 when their mother was killed in a car crash in Paris on August 31 1997. A huge outpouring of grief followed her death, which shocked the world.
Earl Spencer gave an address during the funeral in 1997 (John Stillwell/PA)
Earl Spencer, speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, said: “The feeling, the sort of absolute crashing tidal wave of grief coming at you as you went down this sort of tunnel of deep emotion, it was really harrowing and I still have nightmares about it now.
“So there was the inner turmoil of thinking, ‘My God this is ghastly’ but then the point of thinking these two boys are doing this and it must be a million times worse for them. It was truly horrifying, actually.”
Earl Spencer said he saw the eulogy for his sister as a chance to “speak for somebody who had no longer got a voice”, adding: “All I was trying to do was, as a brother, speak for my sister who was no longer there.”
Earl Spencer said the funeral must have been a ‘million times worse’ for Princes William and Harry (PA)
Told he had said some “pretty pointed things” during the speech while standing opposite the Royal Family, Earl Spencer replied: “I don’t feel I said many pointed things, I believe that every word I said was true and it was important for me to be honest.
“I wasn’t looking to make any jabs at anyone actually, I was trying to celebrate Diana – and if by doing that it showed up particularly the press, I think, in a bad way, well, they had that coming.”
He added: “In her final years in particular, Diana was really brought low by elements of the paparazzi and the tabloids.
“I remember she told me about one man who promised to hound her until the day she died and he would urinate on her grave.
“So she was dealing with a very dark side of the media and even at her funeral I thought it was appropriate to touch on that.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel