THE sense of crisis enveloping Police Scotland has deepened, after more misconduct allegations were levelled at one of its most senior officers.
The Police and Investigations Review Commissioner (Pirc) confirmed it was examining two fresh complaints against Assistant Chief Constable Bernard Higgins.
The Pirc is already conducting two investigations into ACC Higgins, who was suspended in November, and denies any wrongdoing.
The existing investigations concern allegations of misconduct and criminality, including using a police firing range for unauthorised purposes, while the new allegations involve misconduct and gross misconduct.
Both the new complaints were made anonymously to the Pirc, who referred them last month to the Police Scotland’s oversight body, the Scottish Police Authority.
After an initial assessment of their seriousness, the Authority has now referred them back to the Pirc, who will determine whether they merit full-blown investigations.
Earlier this week the Pirc received a fourth complaint regarding Chief Constable Phil Gormley, who has been on special leave since September amid bullying claims.
He is already the subject of three Pirc probes into alleged misconduct, which he denies.
The problems swirling around the single force dominated First Minister’s Questions, with Nicola Sturgeon accused of presiding over a “fiasco”.
A spokesman for Mr Higgins said: "ACC Higgins has been the subject of a campaign of malicious anonymous complaints for many years.
"All of the anonymous complaints have been investigated and have found to be without merit.
"The latest anonymous allegations follow that pattern. Notwithstanding this, ACC Higgins has already provided a full response and denies any wrongdoing."
A spokesman for the Scottish Chief Police Officers Staff Association said: "The Association continue to support ACC Higgins. There is a pattern of anonymous complaints particularly in relation to ACC Higgins and we have significant concerns regarding the nature, volume and frequency of these anonymous complaints."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel